Practical alternatives for collecting client-side device evidence without dynamically generated JavaScript.
When using 51Degrees’ Pipeline API, client‑side evidence gathering via JavaScript can give you richer, more precise detection.
The default integration is dynamic – meaning that JavaScript is requested by the on-page script tag and is generated by the server on the fly for every request.
It may be a different JavaScript based on the evidence provided in the request – e.g. if evidence implies an Apple device – the script will contain snippets specific for that Apple device family, and it will differ from say a Windows desktop script (see 51Degrees documentation).
This may not work for every integration – e.g. it may be impractical to add a direct script tag to load the third-party dynamic JavaScript, and it may need to be embedded within an already loaded existing first party JavaScript.
So here are viable alternatives for scenarios where dynamic script loading is impractical: semi-static (quasi-static) and conceptual static approaches.
Semi‑static (quasi‑static) approach
This is ideal if your environment already has a fixed or static JavaScript file, and you can’t, or don’t want to, inject a dynamically generated one.
How it works: You integrate 51Degrees’ snippet code into your existing script. The embedded code is chosen dynamically according to device characteristics (e.g., iPhone vs. Mac), but the outer wrapper of your script stays static.
Implementation Options:
- Dynamic merge per request: Your server dynamically builds your JS file on each request by querying 51Degrees’ Pipeline for the appropriate snippet, then embeds it into your existing script before sending it to the client.
- Cached variants: Pre-generate 51Degrees script variants (e.g., for major device groups) and cache them. On the client, choose which variant to load based on simple checks (e.g., feature detection). Refresh these cached versions whenever your 51Degrees data file is updated.
- Risk/Consideration: You must ensure the profileIds (or whatever evidence keys you collect) are matched against the same version of the 51Degrees data file used to generate the snippets, or else detection may be incorrect.
Conceptual static approach
This is the most rigid but simplest in environments where dynamic script generation is too expensive or unfeasible.
How it works: You extract JavaScript snippets from a version of the 51Degrees data file and embed them into a static JS file.
Key considerations:
- Maintenance: Because the snippets come from a data file, they need to be refreshed regularly — ideally every time your 51Degrees data file is updated.
- Version sync: The static script and the server-side data file must stay in sync. If your data file changes but your script doesn’t, the evidence you collect may be stale leading to incorrect detection.
- Custom setup: There’s no out-of-the-box static integration from 51Degrees — you need to extract, embed, and manage updates yourself.
Best practices for both approaches
To get the best possible results, consider applying the following best practices.
- Synchronize versions: Always use snippets derived from the same data file version on client and server. Mismatched versions = inconsistent or faulty detection.
- Manage updates: Automate refreshing of snippets (and your data file). For cached or static scripts, set their expiry or deploy a strategy to invalidate them when the data file updates.
- Implement fallback logic: In case the client-side script fails to run (e.g., user blocks JS), fallback to your server-side detection. Use baseline evidence you already capture (like User-Agent) so detection still works.
- Track versions: Tag your static / semi-static script with the data file version it was built from — this helps debugging mismatches.
Why use these approaches?
Here are the main reasons to implement the ideas in this article.
- Performance / Infrastructure constraints: Not every setup allows dynamically generated scripts. Fixed, static JS may be necessary in legacy environments, on CDNs, or restricted deployment contexts.
- Predictability: Using semi-static or static scripts makes behavior more predictable, since you control exactly which snippet code is being delivered.
- Security & simplicity: With a static script, there's less risk of exposing internal 51Degrees infrastructure or data‑file paths, and it's easier to audit.
Final thoughts
While the default dynamic integration gives the greatest flexibility and always ensures up-to-date snippet injection, the semi-static and static approaches are powerful alternatives when you need tighter control, predictable delivery, or tighter integration with existing scripts.
The trade-off is the need to manage snippet versions carefully —but done right, they offer a robust, reliable way to leverage client‑side device evidence in 51Degrees.
Simplify client-side detection with 51Degrees. Get in touch!